This is the pre-peer reviewed version of the following article:-
Epstein-Barr and other viral mimicry of autoantigens,
myelin and vitamin D related proteins, and of EIF2B, the cause of vanishing
white matter disease: Massive mimicry of multiple sclerosis relevant proteins
by the Synechococcus phage.
C.J.Carter
The Epstein-Barr virus expresses
proteins containing numerous short consensi (identical pentapeptides at least,
or longer gapped consensi) that are identical to those in 16 multiple sclerosis
autoantigens or in the products of multiple sclerosis susceptibility genes. Other
viruses implicated in multiple sclerosis also display such mimicry and the
Synechococcus phage was identified as a novel and major contributor to this
phenomenon. Its cyanobacteria hosts favour temperate climes, in line with
multiple sclerosis distribution, and bacterial and phage ecology accords
closely with multiple sclerosis epidemiology. Bovine, ovine, or canine viral
proteins were also identified as autoantigen homologues, in line with
epidemiological data linking multiple sclerosis to cattle density, sheep
contact and dog ownership. Viral
proteins align with known autoantigens, other myelin and vitamin D related
proteins and the translation initiation factor EIF2B, which is implicated in
vanishing white matter disease. These
data suggest that the autoantigens in multiple sclerosis, which causes
demyelination in animal models, may be generated by antibodies raised to viral
protein homologues. Multiple autoantibodies may cause multiple sclerosis via
protein knockdown and immune activation. Their selective removal may be of
clinical benefit as already suggested by promising results using plasmapheresis
or immunoadsorption in certain multiple sclerosis patients.
Introduction
Multiple sclerosis is a debilitating degenerative
disorder characterised by peripheral and central nervous system demyelination,
with consequent neurological defects. An autoimmune component is suggested by
the presence of autoantibodies targeting several myelin
related proteins , including myelin basic protein (MBP), myelin associated
glycoprotein (MAG), and myelin oligodendrocyte protein (MOG) or proteolipid
protein (PLP), inter alia as well as
cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase (CNP) and claudin 11 (1). Certain features of multiple sclerosis can be
induced in laboratory models of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by inoculation
with multiple sclerosis autoantigens, including MBP, PLP, MAG, and MOG, suggesting a key role for
autoantibodies in the genesis of demyelination (2).
A viral cause of multiple
sclerosis has often been suspected, most commonly, the Epstein-Barr virus,
(3)
. Several viruses
including adenoviruses, herpes simplex, coxsackie viruses and the common cold
rhinoviruses have also been associated with relapse in this condition (see
supplementary file msrisk.htm). Viral and bacterial
mimicry of the autoantigens in multiple sclerosis has
also been reported suggesting that pathogen antibodies could also target the
myelin-related and other autoantigens in the disease
(4-6)
.
The large scale integration of non-retroviral DNA into mammalian
genomes has recently been demonstrated (7)
. Both DNA and
RNA viruses have contributed to this phenomenon, the latter via the prior
conversion of RNA to DNA by genomic retrotransposons (8)
. Viral RNA genomes
have also been incorporated into those of plants, arthropods, fungi, nematodes,
and protozoa
(9)
. Convergent viral
evolution may also be in part responsible for these viral/human DNA matches.
As a consequence of
such integration or mimicry, current viral proteins resemble our own. This
phenomenon has been noted for hexapeptide matches for the influenza virus (10) and pentapeptide or greater human matches for
30 other common viruses infecting humans (11;12). Bacterial
proteins show even greater homology to human proteins and the coverage of the
human proteome by both viral and bacterial consensi is total (13;14). In other words,
every single human protein is homologous to a spectrum of viral or bacterial
proteins. Bioinformatics analyses posted at http://www.polygenicpathways.co.uk/blasts.htm
show that each virus (of 28 examined) expresses viral matches (vatches)
homologous to a large but specific spectrum of human proteins and that each
human protein examined expresses vatches to a large but specific spectrum of
viruses. The herpes simplex virus, for example, expresses
proteins containing consensus peptide stretches that are highly homologous to
the products of multiple Alzheimers disease susceptibility genes (13).
Viral
proteins bind to hundreds of host proteins during their life cycle, as recorded
for herpes simplex at http://www.polygenicpathways.co.uk/herpeshost.html
and in the VirusMint interaction database (15), an ability no
doubt related to this homology that allows them to compete with their human
counterparts as protein interactors. In so binding, viruses are able to
interfere with the signalling networks and interactomes of a variety of key
human proteins. A recent analysis of the
host/pathogen interactions of 110 viruses showed nodes of interactions where
the host proteins involved are clearly related to diverse human diseases (16).
Viral
vatches can be identified by comparing human proteins with viral proteomes,
while human vatches can be identified by comparing translated viral genomes
with the human proteome. This exercise, using multiple sclerosis autoantigens,
or the Epstein-Barr virus, as baits reveals multiple suspected and novel viral
culprits and many novel potential autoantigens relevant to multiple sclerosis.
Methods.
The protein sequences of certain autoantigens implicated
in multiple sclerosis (cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase (CNP), Claudin 11 ,
myelin associated glycoprotein (MAG), myelin oligodendrocyte protein (MOG) and
myelin basic protein (MBP) identified from a recent antigen microarray study in
Multiple sclerosis (1) ) were compared
with those of all viral proteomes using the BLAST server at NCBI (blast p) (17).
A more detailed analysis, identifying and counting
the numbers of vatches in MBP, MOG and claudin 11 (aka oligodendrocyte specific
protein) was undertaken, and the results are available in supplementary file
msants.xls. From this analysis, the Synechococcus phage emerged as the primary
vatch contributor and this trail was followed by BLAST analyses of the translated
Synechococcus phage genome. The Epstein-Barr or Synechococcus phage translated
genome was compared to the human proteome with or without the Entrez filter
multiple sclerosis or others (nucleotide vs. protein, BlastX) and the EIF2B5
translation initiation factors subunit compared against all viral proteins.
B-Cell and T cell epitopes were identified using the Immune epitope database
server http://tools.immuneepitope.org/main/index.htm
which predicts the antigenicity of peptide sequences, based on their charge
and hydrophobicity properties
(18;19)
. Because of the
large number of proteins, unless referenced, the brief notes describing the
role of the protein are culled from the summary section of Entrez gene. References relating to the role of viruses in
multiple sclerosis, together with a list of reported autoantigens, are stocked
in supplementary file msrisk.htm. The BLAST
results of this exercise are posted at http://www.polygenicpathways.co.uk/msblasts
where the analyses can be verified by the reader. A BLAST result of the
Synechococcus phage that illustrates the vatches in myelin-related proteins
is provided at http://www.polygenicpathways.co.uk/synechomyelin.htm.
Multiple sclerosis susceptibility genes (any with at least one reported positive
association) were identified from MsGene http://www.msgene.org
(20)
and from genome-wide
association data at http://www.genome.gov/gwastudies/
(21)
.
Statistics
The BLAST algorithm is
designed to detect overall homologies between whole viral and human proteins,
rather than intra-protein identities and pentapeptide or similar identities
within proteins are not considered as significant by the server. In isolation,
such perfect matches are evidently significant. The significance of enrichment
within datasets was analysed by the Chi squared test, assuming expected values
of: genes in genome = 35,000, multiple sclerosis susceptibility candidates
= 328 and number of autoantigens = 37. The
figure of 35,000 approximates to the estimated number of human proteins
(22)
, and the figure of 328 susceptibility
genes is from MsGene. The 37 autoantigens are referenced in Supplementary
file msrisk.htm. In any dataset of genes one would
expect 328/35000 to be multiple sclerosis susceptibility genes and 37/35000
to be autoantigens, providing the expected values for the chi squared test.
Results
Viral homologues of the
autoantigens cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase (CNP), Myelin associated
glycoprotein (MAG), myelin basic protein (MBP) myelin oligodendrocyte protein
(MOG) and Claudin 11 (also known as oligodendrocyte specific protein) include the
Epstein-Barr virus and a host of others implicated in relapse (Coxsackie virus,
herpes simplex, influenza , herpes virus 6,
inter alia) or which have been
detected in multiple sclerosis sera or CSF, or which are known to cause
demyelination (Fig 1, Table 1 and supplementary file msants.xls). A number of
bovine, ovine, canine, feline and other agricultural viral proteins are also
homologous to these proteins, in line with certain epidemiological studies
linking animal contact or distribution to multiple sclerosis (see below). Many
phage or plant viruses, whose contribution to multiple sclerosis has not been
considered, also express autoantigen vatches. Although many of these are unlikely
to infect humans, all are included to show the extent and variety of this
phenomenon.
Conversely, the Epstein-Barr
virus, or the Synechococcus phage (see below), express proteins which are
homologous to the autoantigens, as well as to the products of many multiple
sclerosis susceptibility genes (Fig 2). These targets are highly and significantly
enriched within these datasets (using the BLAST filter multiple sclerosis)
(p < 0.0026 for the autoantigens (but see also Table 2) and P < 1e-30
for the genes). One of the targets
of the Epstein-Barr virus was the translation initiation factor EIF2B4. The
targeting of the EIF2B subunit is of particular interest as mutations in EIF2B5
and EIF2B2 are responsible for vanishing white matter disease, which leads
to intense cerebral demyelination
(23)
. Because of this,
the EIF2B5 subunit was screened against all viral proteomes (Fig 1). A number
of phages and viruses contain EIF2B5 vatches. Those predicted to be highly
antigenic include proteins from the Coxsackie virus and Staphylococcus phage,
streptococcus and Bacillus phages, polyomaviruses, Hepatitis delta; Herpes
virus HSV-7, the human metapneumovirus and human and canine noroviruses (see
supplementary data msvatches.htm). Listeria infection
is known to cause demyelination in chickens
(24)
, and both adenoviruses and hepatitis C have been
linked to multiple sclerosis relapse, found in serum or CSF
(25;26)
or provoke disease resembling multiple sclerosis
(Hepatitis C)
(27)
.
The total number of vatches per virus in MBP, MOG and claudin 11 were counted from the
supplementary table msants.xls which also correlates the viral/human alignments
with the B or T cell antigenicity of the autoantigen or its matching
partner. The diverse and extensive
panoply of human, animal, fish, invertebrate, plant and bacterial viruses
(phages) and other exotica that mimic vatches in MBP, MOG and claudin 11
autoantigens is shown in Table 1. Again, many of these have been implicated in
multiple sclerosis, either as risk factors, associated with relapse, or
detected via antibodies or DNA methodology. Others have been associated with
demyelinating diseases. A number of bovine, ovine, canine and feline viruses
figure among these lists as do lactococcus
and lactobacillus phages.
Multiple sclerosis risk has been associated with unpasteurised milk, bovine
geographical density, contact with sheep, and dog and small pet ownership (28-30) The presence of a number of poultry, equine
and porcine viruses within these lists suggests that other zoonotic viruses
could well contribute to the aetiology of multiple sclerosis or demyelination.
While plant and other
related viruses are not generally believed to cause disease, a pepper mottle
virus is known to cause fever and an immune response in Man (31) and such
diseases may well be more common than thought, particularly in the light of
this type of homology. These viruses, as well as those in foodstuffs (e.g.
meat, fish, shrimp and oysters) can evidently be ingested, inhaled and absorbed
through cuts, while our extensive bacterial microbiome is host to a vast number
of bacteriophages.
By far the most prevalent
vatches, in any class, occurred in two phages infecting Synechococcus and Prochlorococcus
cyanobacteria (Table 1). These are discussed at length below.
Because of this, both
the Epstein-Barr virus and the Synechococcus
phage translated genomes were screened against the human proteome using various
filters. Although other common viruses express as many, or more matching proteins
(Table 1) the Epstein-Barr virus was chosen because of repeated studies implicating this virus as a
risk factor in multiple sclerosis (see introduction). Both viruses express vatches (often predicted
to be immunogenic) to a large number of myelin related proteins, to 16 autoantigens,
to all subunits of the EIF2B translation initiation complex and to vitamin
D related proteins (Table 2). Reduced levels of vitamin D, and low sunlight
exposure, which plays a role in vitamin D synthesis, have been implicated
as risk factors in multiple sclerosis
(32)
.The myelin targeted
BLAST for the Synechococcus phage is available at http://www.polygenicpathways.co.uk/synechomyelin.htm
and annotated further results in supplementary file synechotable.htm
Unfiltered
BLAST results
The homologies above
were trawled using filters (multiple sclerosis, myelin, etc.) that orient the
results towards the requested targets. The results returned from unfiltered
BLASTs return the most homologous proteins and provide an idea of the viral
targets of choice.
The Epstein Barr virus
(Table 3) encodes for a number of proteins that are similar to DNA polymerase
subunits and other enzymes that are no doubt relevant to its implication in
cancer (33), which are not
discussed further. It also encodes for an interleukin 10 homologue, which is
relevant to multiple sclerosis by virtue of its key role in the immune network.
Human IL10, a key multiple sclerosis susceptibility gene, is both
anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive (34). The role of
this highly homologous IL10 viral protein does not appear to have been studied
in relation to multiple sclerosis although infection with such a close mimic
must surely impact upon the immune network. Apart from this, the unfiltered
Epstein-Barr viral BLAST did not preferentially return either multiple
sclerosis genes, apart from IGH@, or autoantigens (Fig 2) (non-significant
enrichment). However the involvement of the virus in cancer and several
autoimmune disorders (systemic lupus
erythematosus , rheumatoid arthritis, and Sjogren's syndrome) (35) as well as
atherosclerosis (36), inter alia, suggest that its predilection may lie
elsewhere, despite a close link with multiple sclerosis. It should also be
noted that these BLASTs are limited by the NCBI server to 20,000 alignments, a
figure that was always exceeded, and that filtered BLASTS (e.g. using the term
multiple sclerosis) return a further set of human proteins that contain
multiple viral/human consensi (see Table 1).
Similarly, the
Synechococcus phage possesses proteins that might also be involved in cancer
(replication factors) (Table 4). The potential contribution of this phage to
such conditions has not been studied, and indeed the role of bacteriophages in
human diseases appears to have been little studied in general. The Synechococcus phage also encodes for a
number of enzymes that are highly homologous to glucose and hexose-6-phosphate
dehydrogenase (a multiple sclerosis susceptibility gene) and phosphogluconate
dehydrogenase. G6PD is important for the maintenance of the levels of the
antioxidant, glutathione (37). Glutathione
depletion has recently been observed in the multiple sclerosis brain (38).
Oligodendrocytes are particularly sensitive to glutathione depletion (39), and the
cytotoxic effects of various insults can be reversed by addition of the
glutathione precursor N-acetyl cysteine (40). Again the presence of such a viral mimic is
likely to impact upon the function of the human enzyme and its metabolic
pathways.
The unfiltered Synechococcus
phage BLAST also targeted several (8) multiple sclerosis susceptibility genes (3.7
fold enrichment P < 0.0001), and 6 autoantigens (24 fold enrichment P <
1e-30) including MAG, MBP, and MOG. Antibodies raised to these proteins in the
experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis model, cause demyelination (2). Thus, although
other proteins are also targeted, the Synechococcus phage shows a clear
predilection for multiple sclerosis related proteins.
While it seems unlikely
that phage DNA (or plant DNA) would be inserted into the human genome, the
viral and human proteins remain highly homologous. Such events also have to be
reasoned in relation to evolutionary time, when our ancestors were simpler
multicellular organisms. Viruses are also inter-related and such homology could
stem from this, and from convergent viral evolution.
Protective
phages and viruses?
Hepatitis B and
cytomegalovirus infections may protect against multiple sclerosis while
Lactobacillus infection has beneficial effects in animal models of multiple
sclerosis (41-43) although the consumption of unpasteurised milk
has also been linked to the distribution multiple sclerosis (30). Hepatitis B, the
cytomegalovirus and various lactobacillus phage proteins align with multiple
sclerosis autoantigens. There may therefore be some subdivision of these phages
and viruses into good or bad. Beneficial viruses may perhaps exert their
effects by blocking T-cell activation, acting as antagonists to their human
counterparts, while toxic vatches may exert their effects via immune-related
protein knockdown or autoimmune activation and cellular destruction.
The
risks of vaccination
Hepatitis B vaccination
has been reported (rarely) to induce a
condition resembling multiple sclerosis (42) and the virus
expresses vatches homologous to EIF2B5, while multiple vaccinations against the
papillomavirus virus , which expresses CNP homologous vatches, have also been
implicated in demyelination (44). Such effects of vaccination could perhaps be
reduced by ensuring that future vaccines do not contain these matching epitopes.
Synechococcus
and Prochlorococcus phages.
These phages are double
stranded circular DNA phages infecting Synechococcus
and Prochlorococcus cyanobacteria
which encompass several related species of marine and freshwater bacteria with
a worldwide distribution. They are the most abundant members of
picophytoplankton in the marine environment. Prochlorococcus is more abundant in warm (> 15°C) waters, while Synechococcus species are predominant in
coastal and more temperate open ocean waters. Synechococci are found in well-lit surface waters in the ocean, and
close to the shore, and are prolific at higher water temperatures near the
surface (45).
Anacystis
nidulans is a freshwater form of Synechococcus. A.Nidulans
thrives on nitrates, phosphates, sulphates and urate and is one freshwater
species responsible for harmful algal blooms (46-49). Nitrate water
levels have been linked to the distribution of multiple sclerosis (50). Its growth is
inhibited by copper, cadmium and silver (51;52) and dependent on iron (53). The
distribution of multiple sclerosis has been reported to be related to the
presence of soluble iron in the soil in Finland (54). While heavy
metals are toxic to the bacteria, (causing phage release); they have a
different effect on their phages. For example the growth of an A-1 cyanophage in
A.Nidulans is stimulated by copper, causing lysis of its bacterial host and
phage release (51). Clusters of
multiple sclerosis have occasionally been reported close to areas of high heavy
metal contamination in water and sewage plants (55) and the
distribution of multiple sclerosis has also been linked to relatively high
water concentrations of barium, calcium,
chloride, chromium, magnesium, manganese, molybdenum, strontium and zinc (50).
Ultraviolet light can stimulate the growth of A.Nidulans (56), but prolonged
exposure reduces its viability , an effect that can be reversed by a shift to
red light conditions (57). Phages are also released from A.Nidulans by UV radiation (58) . Ultraviolet
light is concentrated at the equator while red light predominates at sunset and
sunrise and when the sun is low on the horizon, as at higher latitudes away
from the equator. Together, these effects correlate closely with the
geographical distribution of multiple sclerosis which is more prevalent at
higher latitudes and in areas of low ultraviolet radiation (59) . These effects
are also related to the necessity for sunlight to stimulate Vitamin D
production. Lower levels of this vitamin, again related to a latitudinal
gradient, have also been implicated in
multiple sclerosis risk (60), as have
vitamin D related gene targets (61).Vitamin D also
plays a role in the immune system and stimulates the production of bactericidal
proteins (62). Again this
highlights relationships between genes environmental factors and the immune
system which may condition each others effects. It has also been noted that
the distribution of multiple sclerosis correlates well with the degree of
exposure to near horizon sunlight (63).
Although the distribution of multiple sclerosis is skewed
towards temperate climes, eruption of disease activity is closely correlated
with higher temperatures from March to August in the USA (64). This effect
has also been observed in Italy where, in the summer months, relapse hospital
admissions correlate synchronously with high temperature and low wind speed (65). High
temperatures stimulate the growth of these cyanobacteria, while UV light
favours phage release. High temperature and low wind speed are favourable
conditions for visits to rivers, pools, lakes and beaches.
A recent study in Bosnia and Herzegovina has shown that
multiple sclerosis prevails in inland municipal areas being almost absent in
coastal regions (66). Lower coastal
incidences of multiple sclerosis have also been reported in Ecuador, Croatia,
France and Norway(67-70). Although counter to the above, as residents
in coastal regions would be exposed to the marine environment at an early age,
this could suggest that immunisation might be a consequence of childhood
exposure to these agents. If such is the case, repeated exposure to these
agents at an early age may lead to immune tolerance and recognition of the
viral antigens as self, a possibility that suggests a route for vaccine
development.
While this evidence is circumstantial, the several diverse
converging lines of evidence and the extensive homology of the Synechococcus
phage to myelin related proteins and autoantigens suggests that this and
related phages could be major contributors to the aetiology of multiple
sclerosis.
Multiple
sclerosis genes and the Epstein-Barr virus and Synechococcus phage.
A large number of
multiple sclerosis susceptibility genes encode for products homologous to
Epstein-Barr and the Synechococcus phage and both datasets (with the filter
multiple sclerosis) are heavily enriched in multiple sclerosis genes (Over 20
fold: P < 1e-30: Fig 2). The unfiltered BLAST also showed that the
Synechococcus phage dataset is highly and significantly enriched in multiple sclerosis
related gene products (P < 0.0001) and autoantigens (P< 1e-30).
This marriage of genes to risk factors suggests
that the genes may be risk factors precisely because they encode for products
homologous to those of the viral risk factors, and vice versa. This could perhaps be addressed by partitioning GWAS
data in relation to the predicted sequences of autoantigens present in patients.
The human
proteome has been estimated to contain ~33,869 proteins with an average length
of 375 amino acids (22) (not counting the splice
variants). For pentapeptide matches, this yields a figure of 370*33869
potential matching blocks (12.53 million). These building blocks are identical
to those in viral proteins, as described above, and also to bacterial, fungal
and parasite proteins.
A recent study
of bacterial/human matching from 40 pathogenic and non-pathogenic bacteria demonstrated
47,610 total identical nonapeptide bacterial protein matches found in 10,701
human proteins (71). In a further study, 5,260,383
perfect pentapeptide bacterial protein matches were distributed through 36,014
human proteins (14); In other words, every single
human protein contains multiple peptide matches to diverse species of bacteria.
The same is true with respect to viral proteins, and each human protein
contains consensus sequences from a large but specific spectrum of viruses,
while viral proteins contain consensus sequences to a spectrum of human
proteins (13) .
With the power of
modern day bioinformatics, it should soon be possible to match human and
pathogen convergence to disease.
On
the absence of viral seropositivity or DNA.
As can be seen from the
B-call and T-cell antigenicity analyses of the autoantigens the supplementary
table msants.xls a single human protein can contain several epitopes, and the
same is true for viral proteins. The Epstein-Barr virus expresses 80 proteins,
which may be differentially expressed during various phases of the life cycle.
In the clinical
setting, viral detection is usually performed using a single antibody that is
capable of detecting the virus, if present.
If antibodies raised to the virus have successfully eliminated the pathogen,
evidently, immunochemical or DNA detection methods will be negative. Successful
viral elimination may have come at the cost of collateral damage produced by
autoimmune and inflammatory activation. If certain anti-viral antibodies also
target human proteins, their production will be maintained due to the continual
presence of the human homologous autoantigen. Indeed, because of this
viral/human homology, one could argue that the autoantibodies themselves are
evidence for previous, but currently extinct viral infection. It is known that
antibodies to the Epstein-Barr virus cross react with MOG and other myelin
related autoantigens (72;73).
The past or current presence
of the virus could only be adequately assessed using a large panel of antibodies
to different epitopes and by testing each for viral/human cross reactivity.
Because of such limitations, the absence of a virus, using antibody or DNA
methodology, need not preclude its earlier presence.
Multiple
sclerosis related genes and viral life cycles
Many of the genes
associated with schizophrenia or Alzheimers disease are also involved in the
life cycles of the pathogens implicated as risk factors, and the pathogens
human binding partners impinge upon
signalling networks relevant to the disease (74;75) . A survey
of the Epstein-Barr viral life cycle shows that this is also the case in
multiple sclerosis. Genes implicated in multiple sclerosis are highlighted in
bold in this section (from MsGene). For example the Epstein Barr gp42 protein
binds to the top MsGene susceptibility gene product HLA-DRB1 (76) , while the
viral protein EBNA-3 binds to the vitamin D receptor, VDR (77) . The
Complement receptor 2 (CD21 or CR2) is also a viral receptor (78) relevant to
various complement components implicated in multiple sclerosis (C4A, C5, C7).
The virus also expresses a protein that is
highly homologous to IL10, while the
viral latent membrane protein encodes for a mimic of CD40 (79). The viral
latent membrane protein 1 (LMP1) also functions as a constitutively activated
receptor of the tumour necrosis factor (TNF)
receptor family (80) and activates
the signal transducer and activator of transcription STAT3 (81). LMP1 also
binds to tyrosine kinase TYK2 and
inhibits interferon signalling (82). Interferon alphas (IFNA2, IFNA17) or gamma (IFNG)
, interferon receptors (IFNAR1,IFNAR2 ,
IFNGR1 ), interferon regulated
proteins (IFIH1, IFIT1) or regulatory
factors (IRF1, IRF5, IRF8) have all
been associated with multiple sclerosis and viral LMP1 expression is controlled
by the interferon regulatory factor IRF5
(83). The viral protein BHRF1 inhibits apoptosis by
binding to a number of pro-apoptotic proteins (BID, PUMA and BAK) all of which interact with the apoptosis
regulatory protein BCL2 (84), while the
viral protein BZLF1 inhibits the expression of the TNF receptor TNFRSF1A (85) . The Epstein-Barr
virus is reactivated by the transforming growth factor TGFB1 (86). Protein kinase
R (EIF2AK2) is a double stranded DNA
viral detector involved in the reaction to many viruses (87). The APOE genotype also determines
susceptibility to infectious
mononucleosis caused by the Epstein-Barr virus (88). The Synechococcus phage also
expresses a protein that is highly homologous to H6PD
This incomplete survey illustrates some of the multiple sclerosis
susceptibility genes that are influenced by or influence the Epstein-Barr
virus, and such interactions are likely to condition the risk-promoting effects
of both genes and virus.
Discussion
The natural world
abounds with hundreds of viruses expressing vatches identical to those in
multiple sclerosis autoantigens. It is evident from this and other analyses that
single human proteins contain vatches identical to those in dozens of viruses
and bacteria and that single viruses and bacteria express vatches identical to
those in hundreds of human proteins. The viral and bacterial coverage of the human
proteome is total and no protein is exempt (12-14). These matching sequences can be identical, for
example pentapeptides or more, as observed by other authors (12) or longer
gapped consensi (see Table 2). From an immunological perspective, one could
argue that the slightly differing consensi are dissimilar enough to be regarded
as non-self, but similar enough for their antibodies to also target the human
homologue, and thus the more malignant.
Epitope mapping in relation to human/viral cross-reactivity would be
useful in this respect. Although multiple viral/human vatches exist, the
overall spectrum of the viral to human and human to viral vatches is distinct
(see Figs 1 and 2 and the supplementary table msants.xls Viruses are implicated
in many diseases, and these spectra, and the function of their human targets
may define the diseases likely to be provoked by viral interference. In multiple sclerosis, these viruses include
those already implicated as risk factors and a host of others whose risk
promoting or protective effects can only be guessed at. This survey clearly
implicates the Epstein-Barr virus in multiple sclerosis and confirms a role for
many others that have been reported to affect onset or relapse (e.g. Influenza,
herpes simplex, Coxsackie viruses and rhinoviruses, inter alia).
The survey also
identified a number of canine, feline, bovine and ovine viruses expressing
vatches common to multiple sclerosis autoantigens. Such homology may well
explain the reported relationships of multiple sclerosis to dog and small pet
ownership as well as to sheep contact and bovine density. The possibility of
other zoonoses (equine, porcine or poultry viruses, or even bat contact) cannot
be ruled out, nor can the presence of viruses in our diet, given the homology
of their proteins to multiple sclerosis autoantigens. While plant viruses are
generally considered as innocuous, the example of the Synechococcus phage illustrates the realms of the possible.
Although the
Epstein-Barr virus extensively mimics multiple sclerosis proteins, supporting a
role for the virus as a risk factor or causative agent, many other viruses
share this property. This diversity likely explains many of the controversies
in relation to viral risk factors. Where the Epstein-Barr virus is not
involved, there are a host of other phages or viruses, to take its place. Antibodies
to bacterial peptides have also been shown to cross-react with MBP and MOG (89).
In
addition, antibodies to the virus may persist, due to sustained encounters with
the human homologue autoantigens, even after elimination of the virus. These mimics target various autoantigens from
the same known panel. This type of vatch mining is thus able to confirm the
role of current viral suspects and to identify many others that may have a key
role in the pathology of multiple sclerosis. This approach is also able to
predict other potential autoantigens that are highly relevant to multiple
sclerosis, for example the myelin or oligodendrocyte transcription factors,
vitamin D related proteins, and the translation initiation factor subunits of
EIF2B. BLAST analysis of the EIF2B5 subunit in turn identified novel viral
suspects, particularly the Listeria phage and adenovirus 50.
Vatches may exert their
effects via immune related knockdown of their human counterparts, and may also
act as mimics, for example IL10 , dummy ligands, or decoy receptors or enzymes
, for example G6PD, and may also interfere with the target proteins
interaction network via theft of its usual binding partners They may also
trigger an autoimmune response to their human homologues causing cellular
degeneration via immune and inflammatory attack (13;90) and this may
well be the case in multiple sclerosis. It is already accepted that multiple
sclerosis is an autoimmune disorder, but this survey may help to identify the
most important viruses and autoantigens. These might perhaps be targeted,
eventually by vaccines, and perhaps by anti-antibody antibodies or by
immunisation with epitopes from the apparently beneficial viruses.
This analysis infers
that multiple sclerosis may be caused by pathogen-derived autoantibodies, whose
formation is both genetically and immunologically conditioned. The concept of antibody toxicity has already
been largely proven by the models of experimental allergic encephalomyelitis
induced by antibodies to myelin antigens, (PLP, MAG and MOG inter alia) (2) initially
developed by inoculation of rhesus monkeys with brain extracts in 1933 (91). While these
models may not exactly mimic the human condition, this may relate to the fact that
several autoantigens can be observed in multiple sclerosis, while the
laboratory models tend to focus on one.
Specificity
and conditional effects.
Many are infected with
the Epstein-Barr virus, or with other common viruses affecting multiple
sclerosis or relapse, but do not develop multiple sclerosis. A host of viral
proteins from human, bacterial, plant and animal viruses not (yet?) implicated
in multiple sclerosis also express proteins that are homologous to myelin
related proteins.
How can this diversity
be reconciled to an autoimmunity theory, positing that viral homologues create
the autoantibodies in multiple sclerosis? Although this is backed up by the
homologies of the Epstein-Barr virus, and many others implicated in multiple
sclerosis, to key myelin-related proteins, many other viruses share this
property. In the case of the
Synechococcus phage, the ecology of it and its host correlate well with the
known epidemiology of multiple sclerosis, and perhaps other examples exist
within this extensive panoply. The presence of bovine, ovine, canine and feline
viruses within this spectrum may also explain the links of multiple sclerosis
to bovine density, contact with sheep, and dog and small pet ownership.
Viruses will not always
raise antibodies that also target their human homologues and clues to this
conundrum perhaps lie in human susceptibility genes that determine protein
sequences, and therefore the extent of homology to viral proteins, and in the
large number of immune-related genes
that have been associated with multiple sclerosis (92;93). The
concentration of multiple sclerosis related genes in the viral datasets hints at
such conditioning.
In Sjogrens syndrome,
different HLA alleles are associated with the generation of autoantibodies to
the SSA and SSB autoantigens (94). The propensity
for developing autoantibodies to particular proteins is also genetically
determined and inherited (95). The recognition of self and non-self is also
determined and imprinted soon after birth. Maternally transferred antibodies
via the placenta, or after birth via colostrum may also influence the
subsequent development of the immune system (96).
Risk factor and genetic
association studies are notoriously inconsistent, but the evident marriage of
genes and risk factors suggests a model that embraces such heterogeneity.
The production of
antibodies deleterious to the function of protein X will depend upon a number
of factors including our genes, that determine protein sequences, whether, when
and which strain of pathogen is encountered, whether our genes aid or prevent
infection by interfering with pathogen life cycles, the extent of the epitope
match between human and pathogen protein, whether or not this match is deemed
to be self or foreign, how many
infections from diverse agents fulfil these criteria, immune-related
genes, and whether or not the ability to raise autoantibodies has been
inherited. Many of these factors are
interdependent and, rather like a casino slot machine, the final extent of risk
may be determined by the number of matching reels. Because so many factors may
be conditional upon each other, heterogeneity when testing single risk factors
in isolation is to be expected. It may be possible to partition GWAS data in
relation to some of these variables, to test such multiple interactions.
Immunopharmacology:
Antibody-mediated knockdown as a pathological mechanism.
The
symptoms of multiple sclerosis can be reliably produced in mice by various
transgenic knockouts; for example MAG, MBP or myelin P0 knockouts impair
myelination (97;98). While the
expression of such proteins may be reduced in multiple sclerosis, due largely
to white matter loss (99), there is
little to suggest total or partial overall protein knockout as seen in the
transgenic models. However, functional protein knockdown could well be
accomplished by antibodies to these proteins, a situation rendered possible by
the ability of antibodies to traverse the blood-brain barrier (100) and also to
enter cells (101). Given the viral homology to so many
autoantigens , it thus seems likely that viral antibodies, that also target
human proteins are the causative agents in multiple sclerosis, producing their
effects via antibody-mediated knockdown of multiple proteins relevant to the disease
process, a scenario that is independent of immune-related processes, where the
antibodies are acting simply as antagonists.
Such an effect would prevail even during immunosuppression, unless the
antibodies were eliminated, a factor that perhaps explains the relative lack of
success of immunosuppressive strategies in multiple sclerosis (102).
Autoantibody
removal as a therapeutic strategy
Coastal
residence appears to reduce the incidence of multiple sclerosis in some cases,
a factor that could tentatively be related to the development of immunity to
marine Synechococcus or Prochlorococcus phages, presumably via a route that
does not involve autoantibody generation. Studies of this phenomenon could
perhaps lead to a vaccine for multiple sclerosis. Desensitisation procedures
might also be considered in the research setting. These data also suggest that
autoantibodies are a cause, and not a consequence of multiple sclerosis. If
such is the case, then removal of these antibodies by dialysis over an affinity
column laced with appropriate antigens and antibodies, tailored to each individuals
autoantigen profile, might be expected to stem the progression of multiple
sclerosis, and to favour the success of other curative regimes such as stem
cell therapy. In fact plasmapheresis, which exchanges plasma (containing
antibodies) with synthetic or donor plasma, was initially shown to be of
clinical benefit in a small (16 patients) trial over 20 years ago in Japan.
Muscle power improved in all patients and a proportion also showed amelioration
in sitting, standing and walking ability
while most reported benefits in standing still, sensory disturbance,
visual disturbance, and urinary complications (103). However, a
recent retrospective analysis reported that such treatment was ineffective in
multiple sclerosis, but beneficial in steroid-resistant exacerbations in
relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (104). Plasma immunoadsorption which removes immunoglobulins,
immune complexes, and complement from plasma has also been reported to delay disease progression and to
ameliorate symptoms in multiple sclerosis in a number of studies (105-109).
Plasmapheresis
removes all antibodies, and a number of other plasmaborne proteins, which may
be either malevolent (e.g. autoantibodies and pro-inflammatory cytokines) or
beneficial (e.g. Growth factors or
protective antibodies or cytokines), while immunoadsorption may also remove
beneficial antibodies, or immune complexes. The results of both plasmapheresis
and immunoadsorption are promising but a more targeted approach aimed
specifically at autoantibodies, perhaps tailored to each individuals
autoantigen profile might well be more effective.
Further research on these
homologous pathogen/human proteins, and the development of antibody array
technology on the same scale as genome-wide association studies would greatly
aid out understanding of the role of viruses and other pathogens, the microbiome
and autoimmunity in multiple sclerosis and many other diseases.
Table
1: The overall number of viral vatches
(N in brackets) per species for combined data from the MBP, MOG and claudin
11 autoantigens the supplementary table msants.xls Those in bold text have been implicated
in multiple sclerosis (associated with the disease or with relapse, or found
in multiple sclerosis (antibodies or DNA) or cause demyelination. Phage bacterial
hosts that have been found in multiple sclerosis sera or CSF or animal species
(cattle, sheep, dogs and household pets) that have been implicated as risk
factors are also highlighted in bold (see supplementary
file msrisk.htm.)
Human |
Animal |
Plant, bacteria and others |
|
HIV-1 (15) Influenza A (13) Enterobacteria
phage (12) Hepatitis B (10) Bacillus
phage (9) Cytomegalovirus(9) Hepatitis C (8) Poliovirus (8) Human rhinovirus
(common cold)(8) Mycobacterium phage (7) Staphylococcus phage (6) Dengue
virus (6) Klebsiella
phage (5) Measles (5) Human Coronavirus
(5) Enterovirus (5) Acinetobacter phage (5) HSV-2 (4) Saffold
virus (4) Norovirus
(4) Lactococcus
phage (Milk) (4) Clostridium
phage (4) Epstein-Barr
virus (4) Saffold
virus (4) Salmonella
phage (4) Human adenovirus
4 (4) Pseudomonas phage (3) Rotavirus
(3) JC Polyomavirus
(3) Adeno-associated
virus (3) Norwalk
virus (3) Human
astrovirus (3) Hepatitis
delta (3) Human herpesvirus
8 (3) Vibrio
phage (3) Enterococcus
phage (3) Burkholderia
phage (3) Listeria phage (2) Zika
virus (2) Torque teno virus
(2) GB
virus (2) Shigella
phage (2) Wesselsbron
virus (2) Human coxsackievirus
(2) Streptococcus
pyogenes phage (2) BK polyomavirus
(2) Human parvovirus
(2) Varicella (2) Chapare
virus (2) Serra
do Navio virus (2) West
Nile virus (2) St. Louis encephalitis
virus (2) Lacrosse
encephalitis (2) Tensaw
virus (2) HHV-7
(2) Rubella (2) HHV-7
(2) Yersinia
phage (2) Toscana
virus (1 and all below) HMO
Astrovirus Torque
teno mini virus Vaccinia virus Variola
virus Polyomavirus
HPyV7 Human herpesvirus
6 Influenza C Fiji
disease virus Bunyamwera
virus Chiba
virus Moussa
virus Tanapox
virus Torque
teno sus virus |
Bat
coronavirus (8) Infectious
bronchitis virus (Poultry)(7) Bovine viral diarrhea
virus (7) Meleagrid
herpesvirus 1 (poultry) (6) Feline coronavirus
(6) Grouper
iridovirus (Fish) (5) Oliveros
virus (Rodents) (5) Orange-spotted
grouper iridovirus (Fish) (4) Lymphocystis
disease virus (Fish) (4) Alcelaphine
herpesvirus (cattle) (4) Gallid
herpesvirus 1 and 2 (Poultry) (4) Shrimp
white spot syndrome virus (3) Porcine
reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (3) Equid
herpesvirus 9 Ovine herpesvirus 2
(3) Fowlpox
(3) Pipistrellus
bat coronavirus (3) Canine papillomavirus
(3) Swine
fever virus Theiler's encephalomyelitis
virus (3) Visna Maedi virus(sheep) Deerpox
virus (2) Glossina
pallidipes salivary gland hypertrophy virus (2) Turkey
coronavirus (2) Marseillevirus
(2) Fowl
adenovirus 4 (2) Peste-des-petits-ruminants virus (sheep) (2) Fowl
adenovirus 4 (2) Foot
and mouth virus (cattle)
(2) Feline herpesvirus
1 (2) Turbot
reddish body iridovirus (2) Equine
papillomavirus (2) Psittacid
herpesvirus 1 (Parrots) (2) Tamana
bat virus (2) Equine
coronavirus (2) Ostreococcus
tauri virus (Oyster) (2) Ostreid
herpesvirus 1 (Oyster) (2) Orange-spotted
grouper iridovirus (Fish)(2) Bluetongue
virus (cattle)(1) Bovine herpesvirus
4 Sandfly
Sicilian Turkey virus Wood
mouse herpesvirus Apodemus
flavicollis rhadinovirus (mouse) Avian
paramyxovirus Ornithogalum
mosaic virus Adoxophyes
honmai NPV Ateline
herpesvirus 3 (monkey) Porcine
epidemic diarrhea virus Drosophila
affinis sigma virus Infectious
hematopoietic necrosis virus (Fish) Avian
leukosis virus Bovine herpesvirus 5 Cowpox Rabbitpox Ectromelia
virus Porcine
teschovirus Swinepox Infectious
salmon anemia virus Ovine enzootic nasal
tumor virus Small ruminant lentivirus (sheep) Bluetongue
virus (cattle) (1) Porcine
lymphotropic herpesvirus Raniid
herpesvirus 2 (frog) Equid
herpesvirus 1 Gill-associated
virus Fowl
plaque virus Cyprinid
herpesvirus 3 (Goldfish) Bombyx
mori cypovirus (Moth) Duck
enteritis virus Norwegian
salmonid alphavirus Hexaprotodon
liberiensis gammaherpesvirus African
swine fever Ictalurid
herpesvirus 1 Canarypox
virus Rachiplusia
nu MNPV Anatid
herpesvirus Ostreococcus
virus Venezuelan
equine encephalitis virus |
Synechococcus phage (24) Prochlorococcus phage (10) Aeromonas phage (6) Acanthamoeba polyphaga mimivirus (5) Rice gall dwarf virus (3) Cherry rasp leaf virus (3) Emiliania huxleyi virus (3) Cherry necrotic rusty mottle virus (2) Deftia phage (2) Turnip mosaic virus Rice stripe virus (2) Plum bark necrosis stem pitting-associated virus (2) Aphid lethal paralysis virus (2) Cherry necrotic rusty mottle virus (2) Physalis mottle virus (2) Paramecium bursaria Chlorella virus (2) Broad bean wilt virus (2) Lettuce infectious yellows virus (2) Cycas necrotic stunt virus (2) Acanthocystis turfacea Chlorella virus (2) Cassava brown streak virus (2) Acute bee paralysis virus (2) Pennisetum mosaic virus (2) Sphaeropsis sapinea RNA virus (2) Choristoneura fumiferana nucleopolyhedrovirus (2) Anticarsia gemmatalis nucleopolyhedrovirus (2) Asian prunis virus (1) Microplitis demolitor bracovirus Trichoplusia ni ascovirus Sulfolobus virus Gordonia terrae phage White clover mosaic virus Alfalfa mosaic virus Pepino mosaic virus Bean pod mottle virus Turnip ringspot virus Eimeria brunetti RNA virus Pyrococcus abyssi virus Citrus yellow mosaic virus Patchouli mild mosaic virus Sunflower chlorotic mottle virus Brochothrix phage Rhodocococcus phage Rhizobium phage Xestia c-nigrum granulovirus Helicoverpa armigera granulovirus Tomato leaf curl New Delhi virus Wheat eqlid mosaic virus Sonchus yellow net virus Grapevine chrome mosaic virus Actinoplanes phage Feline immunodeficiency virus Spodoptera exiguae ascovirus Heliotis virescens ascovirus Hyphantria cunea nucleopolyhedrovirus Impatiens necrotic spot virus Xanthomonas phage Southern cowpea mosaic virus Sugarcane yellow leaf virus Cydia pomonella granulovirus Peanut mottle virus Rhodothermus phage |
|
Table
2: Human vatches identical to those in Synechococcus phage or Epstein-Barr
virus proteins: Genes that have been associated with multiple sclerosis in
at least one study from MsGene are indicated or barred if negative. Autoantigens
in multiple sclerosis are noted or highlighted in grey. The six highest scoring
antigenic amino acids (B-cell: P,G,D,E,S,T) are highlighted in grey.+ = an
amino acid with similar physicochemical properties. (See supplementary file
msants.htm for antigen references)
Myelin related |
Vatches |
|
Synechococcus phage |
Epstein-Barr |
|
CLDN11 claudin 11 (oligodendrocyte protein) |
CRALM
& I+LLLTV
& TIVSFG |
ILLALC
& LLTVLP |
CNP 2',3'-cyclic nucleotide 3'
phosphodiesterase |
DFLPLY & KSYSK |
SRGEEVG+
& SSETLR |
MAG myelin associated glycoprotein |
SWKP & GTMVAV & CLCVVK
& PAVSPED & IVCYIT |
LLGDLGL & HFVPTR & YAEIRV |
MBP myelin
basic protein MSGENE |
LSPPK & NRIRQ &
VPPRS |
LSRFSW & SQGKGRG & RTPPP |
MOBP myelin-associated
oligodendrocyte basic protein |
PRSERQ & RLSKNQ |
SICKSG & +WICC |
MOG myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein MSGENE |
CSFLLLL & LPVLLLQ |
RPPF-RV & LRGKLR |
MPZ myelin protein zero MPZL2 and MPZL3 (not shown) and MYEF2 myelin expression factor 2 |
DPRW GS VI & PK SVRRR |
PPDIVG & PGAPS |
MYT1 myelin transcription factor
1 Also MYT1L (not
shown) |
EN+EEIK & LN STRCW & TPGCDG & PSSSY |
LSTRCWE & NQDPE-KD |
OMG oligodendrocyte myelin
glycoprotein |
SFLLLL & LNLSYN |
NNIK-LD & S VTQP-VTK |
PLP1 proteolipid protein 1 |
QDYEY & TLVSLL F |
FPGKVC & LVSLLT |
PMP2 peripheral myelin protein 2
Also PMP22 (not
shown) |
WKLVS & IITIR |
SIVTL+ & M-SNKFL |
RTN4 Reticulon 4
|
LSLKN & IDHYLG & SPSAIFS |
SFRIYK &
KLVKE |
Translation initiation
(EIF2B1,2,3,4 and 5) only EIF2B1 is shown |
||
EIF2B1 eukaryotic translation
initiation factor 2B, subunit 1 alpha |
TLLFL-RDKG
& SVAVSSG-E & TILTH |
LLEFLK & HPWVD & ADLCH-F |
Vitamin D related |
||
VDR
vitamin D (1,25- dihydroxyvitamin D3) receptor |
PGVQD & QTYI |
GVQDA & EA+QDR |
GC group-specific component
(vitamin D binding protein) |
KLVNK
& +VNKH |
KRVLVL
|
CYP24A1 cytochrome P450, family
1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3) 24-hydroxylase |
EDNFED & ESMRLT |
Q+AAALP-PT & KLLKE |
CYP27B1 cytochrome P450, family
27, subfamily B, polypeptide 1 25-hydroxyvitamin D-1 alpha hydroxylase |
EHRRCR & LVRDV |
RV-HRVRW
& RRC-QRAC |
Other autoantigens (CLDN11, CNP, MAG, MBP see above) |
||
ARRB2 arrestin, beta 2 |
LDK--YYHGE L+ & AAPET-+VPV+ & VYTITP & DTNLIE |
PRPPTRL & PNPPR-P & PVP
PRPP & PRPQS-PE |
ATP2C1 ATPase, Ca++
transporting, type 2C, member 1 |
L+ FWREL-DN & KKLPIV & SKLVPP & LTQQQR |
V+VDGDVV & SQ+-AVAIAS & EVSHRR & VGIIDP |
CRYAB crystallin, alpha B |
PLTI-SSL
& PPSFLR
& FISREF & TSTSLS |
SL--KDAVRVD
G & RSPSP & ELRER & PVSNGG |
CNTN2 contactin 2 (axonal) |
LRDLL & FDNES & +SPRDN & NGRR+P |
PPPRRPPG
& HLTPTL-L
& PP PRRP-GSW & RASPP T |
HMOX1 heme oxygenase (decycling)
1 |
LHRK--LEQ LEEEIE & PGLRQ & WQEVI & YLGDLS |
TR-SQAPP
& SPSR-PGLR & DQSPS & LRQRAS |
NEFL neurofilament, light
polypeptide |
VRRSYSS & KDEVSE & LLVLRQ &
AAISN+L
& AELLVL & SGSL+P & APVSSS |
EGLEE L & TQEKAQ & SLSVR S & SAPVS |
NFASC neurofascin |
HTIQQKFTLK & AKDPRV & SSSME & +FRSGG |
PDRP-DLE & GN+SSEAT & APP-LPP & GNPAPS & PPGLP |
TALDO1 transaldolase 1 |
ISPFVGR & Y ELVEE & LISPFV & LVPVLS |
PGRVS & PGRV-T & DARLS & +QIKNA+KL |
SOD1 superoxide dismutase 1,
soluble |
GNAGS & GVIGT |
VKVWGS+K & LGKGGN & EFGDN & GRTLVV
+ |
TKT Transketolase |
YKSQDP & CLL-DGE & LVAILD & EELCK |
SLG+GLG & G+EDKE & GQAKHQ & LCGS-CG |
TPI1 triosephosphate isomerase 1 |
FVGGNWK & MA-EDGEEA & EVVCA P & EVVCA
P |
+GRKQSLG & TRP+PSP & LLG-LGPS & SLGPS-GR |
Autoantigens: Tested: ARRB2,
ATP2C1, CNP, CNTN2, CLDN11 , CRYAB, HMOX1, MBP, MAG, MOG, NEFL, NFASC PLP1, PMP2, SOD1,TALDO1, TKT
PMP2 TALDO1, TPI1 . Not tested : ARRB1, ARR3,Bullous pemphigoid antigen, Beta
amyloid , DKFZp686A1481, Enolase, Heat shock proteins, HSP60, HSP70,
heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein B1, KIAA1279 lymphocyte protein
p542 MOBP, OSP GAPDH, , PACSIN2,
SPAG16, Proteasomal components PSMA1,
PSMA2 |
Table 3: Human
proteins with significant overall homology to Epstein-Barr viral
proteins: Viral translated
genome vs. human proteins: No filter |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Gene |
P Value |
Notes
(from Entrez Gene) |
|
|||||
IL10
interleukin 10 Identity :
140/175 (80%), Positives = 144/175 (83%), Gaps = 21/175 (12%) := |
4.00E-100 |
Cytokine produced by monocytes
and lymphocytes. Affects in immunoregulation and inflammation. Down-regulates
the expression of Th1 cytokines, MHC class II antigens , and costimulatory
molecules on macrophages. Enhances B cell survival, proliferation, and
antibody production. |
|
|||||
POLD1 polymerase (DNA
directed), delta 1, catalytic subunit 125kDa |
1.00E-50 |
Involved in DNA replication and
repair. |
|
|||||
UNG uracil-DNA glycosylase |
1.00E-32 |
Prevents mutagenesis by
eliminating uracil from DNA molecules by cleaving the N-glycosylic bond and
initiating the base-excision repair pathway |
|
|||||
PFAS
phosphoribosylformylglycinamidine synthase |
2.00E-12 |
Catalyzes the fourth step of
inosine monophosphate biosynthesis. |
|
|||||
PRNP prion protein |
2.00E-12 |
Membrane
glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored glycoprotein that tends to aggregate
into rod-like structures. |
|
|||||
TBC1D9 TBC1 domain family,
member 9 (with GRAM domain) |
7.00E-07 |
?? |
|
|||||
RRM2 ribonucleotide reductase
M2 |
4.00E-06 |
Catalyzes the formation of
deoxyribonucleotides from ribonucleotides. |
|
|||||
hCG23833- |
4.00E-06 |
?? |
|
|||||
RRM1 ribonucleotide reductase
M1 |
8.00E-05 |
Essential for the production of
deoxyribonucleotides prior to DNA synthesis in S phase of dividing cells. |
|
|||||
REV3L DNA polymerase zeta
catalytic subunit |
6.00E-04 |
Catalyzes the polymerization of
deoxyribonucleotides into a DNA strand. |
|
|||||
POLA1 polymerase (DNA
directed), alpha 1, catalytic subunit |
0.003 |
Encodes the catalytic subunit
of DNA polymerase. |
|
|||||
RRM2B ribonucleotide reductase
M2 B (TP53 inducible) |
0.005 |
Catalyzes the conversion of
ribonucleoside diphosphates to deoxyribonucleoside diphosphates, necessary
for DNA synthesis. |
|
|||||
The
alignment of IL10 with the BPRF viral protein (capsid docking protein on
nuclear lamina) IL10 SRVKTFFQMKDQLDNLLLKESLLEDFKGYLGCQALSEMIQFYLEEVMPQA 98 BPRF SRVKTFFQTKDEVDNLLLKESLLEDFKGYLGCQALSEMIQFYLEEVMPQA 91 IL10 ENQDPDIKAHVNSLGENLKTLRLRLRRCHRFLPCENKSKAVEQVKNAFNK 148 BPRF ENQDPEAKDHVNSLGENLKTLRLRLRRCHRFLPCENKSKAVEQIKNAFNK 141 IL10 LQEKGIYKAMSEFDIFINYIEAYMTMKIRN 178 BPRF LQEKGIYKAMSEFDIFINYIEAYMTIKAR- 170 |
|
|||||||
Table 4 Human proteins with significant overall
homology to Synechococcus phage proteins
Gene |
P Value |
Notes (from
Entrez Gene) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G6PD glucose-6-phosphate
dehydrogenase |
1.00E-41 |
Generates NADPH, a key electron donor in the defense
against oxidizing agents and in reductive biosynthetic reactions. |
|
|
H6PD
hexose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (glucose 1-dehydrogenase) |
4.00E-31 |
There are 2 forms of glucose-6-phosphate
dehydrogenase. This form shows activity with other hexose-6-phosphates, especially
galactose-6-phosphate. |
|
|
RFC5 replication factor C (activator
1) 5, 36.5kDa |
2.00E-18 |
Elongation of primed DNA
templates by DNA polymerases requires the accessory proteins proliferating
cell nuclear antigen and replication factors. |
|
|
RFC2 replication factor C
(activator 1) 2, 40kDa |
4.00E-17 |
This gene encodes the 40 kD
subunit, which has been shown to be responsible for binding ATP. |
|
|
RFC4 replication factor C
(activator 1) 4, 37kDa |
2.00E-16 |
This gene encodes the 37 kD
subunit. |
|
|
PGD phosphogluconate
dehydrogenase |
1.00E-09 |
6-phosphogluconate
dehydrogenase is the second dehydrogenase in the pentose phosphate shunt. |
|
|
RFC3 replication factor C
(activator 1) 3, 38kDa |
6.00E-05 |
This gene encodes the 38 kDa
subunit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fig 1: Viruses expressing vatches identical to those in human multiple sclerosis autoantigens. The number of hits is influenced by the data; For example, MAG was homologous to Influenza proteins within multiple strains of the virus, occluding underlying data. Targeted sweeps, eliminating the first set of viruses would reveal a further set of with diminishing vatch size, but increased numbers. For example, the CNP vatches are smaller, but more viruses are implicated. Viruses implicated in multiple sclerosis (risk factors, modifying relapse, DNA or antibody detection) or demyelinating viruses are highlighted in grey as are the phage hosts similarly implicated. Bovine, ovine, feline and canine viruses are also highlighted.
CNP |
Acanthamoeba polyphaga mimivirus Acinetobacter
phage Aeromonas phage African swine
fever virus Agrotis segetum granulovirus
Ambystoma
tigrinum virus
Asian prunus virus Autographa californica nucleopolyhedrovirus Bacillus phage
Bacillus thuringiensis phage Bathycoccus
sp bovine viral diarrhea virus Bear Canyon
virus
Beet necrotic yellow vein virus Blackberry virus Y Borna
disease virus Bovine herpesvirus
5 Bovine leukemia virus Bovine parainfluenza virus Bovine polyomavirus Buggy Creek virus Butterbur mosaic virus Canine
calicivirus Canine distemper virus Canine
papillomavirus Cherry green ring mottle virusClostridium
phage Cowpox Cyanophage
PSS2 Duck hepatitis A virus Edge Hill virus Epizootic haematopoietic necrosis virus Feline calicivirus Feline
immunodeficiency virus Gallid herpesvirus 3 Garlic virus Grapevine rupestris
stem pitting-associated virus Helleborus net necrosis virus Heliothis virescens ascovirus Hepatitis delta
virus Horseradish latent virus Human adenovirus
Human astrovirus
Human coxsackievirus Human echovirus Human enterovirus
Human herpesvirus 3 Human herpesvirus 5 Human herpesvirus 6B Human immunodeficiency virus 1 Human bocavirus
Human parainfluenza virus
Human parechovirus Human
parvovirus Human rhinovirus
Hyperthermophilic Archaeal Virus Influenza A virus JC polyomavirusKashmir bee
virus Klebsiella
phage
Lactobacillus phage
Leucania separata nuclear polyhedrosis virus
Maize chlorotic dwarf virus Micromonas pusilla reovirus Mopeia Lassa
reassortant 29 Mopeia virus Morogoro virus Murid herpesvirus
2 Mycobacterium phage Narcissus symptomless virus Nicotiana velutina
mosaic virus
Ovine adenovirus
Paramecium bursaria Chlorella virus Peanut
clump virus
Peste-des-petits-ruminants virus Phaius virus Porcine
teschovirus Potato virus Pseudoalteromonas
phage Pseudocowpox virus Pseudomonas
phage Prochlorococcus phage Ralstonia phage Rachiplusia ou MNPV Rhodothermus phageSemliki forest virus
Shallot virusShigella phage
Simian picornavirus Spinach severe curly top virus Soybean mosaic virus Staphylococcus phage Synechococcus
phage Tiger frog virus
Toscana virus
Trichoplusia ni ascovirus Vibrio
phage Watermelon
mosaic virus Wood mouse
herpesvirus Zygocactus virus |
MAG |
Adult diarrheal rotavirus Allium virus Bacillus
phage Burkholderia
phage Colorado
tick fever virus Corynebacterium phage Enterobacteria phage Epstein-Barr
virus Euproctis pseudoconspersa nucleopolyhedrovirus Human herpesvirus 5 Influenza
A virus Lily virus
X Marseillevirus Musca domestica salivary gland hypertrophy
virus Mycobacterium phage Papillomavirus Pelargonium zonate spot virus Pseudomonas phage
Psittacid herpesvirus Staphylococcus phage Streptococcus
phage A Vibrio phage Yersinia phage |
MBP |
Bacillus phage Banna virus
Bean yellow disorder virus Broome
virus Campylobacter phage Citrus tristeza virus Enterobacteria phage Epstein-Barr Felid Herpesvirus 1 Hepatitis B Hepatitis delta
Human adenovirus 4
Human
herpesvirus 2 Human herpesvirus 3 Human herpesvirus 7 Human parvovirus Human T-lymphotropic virus Influenza A Listeria phage Marseillevirus Measles
virus Newcastle disease virus Norovirus Pepino
mosaic virus Rabbit hemorrhagic
disease virus Rice stripe virus Rotavirus
A Rubella
virus Sapovirus sea trout
rhabdovirus Theiler's encephalomyelitis virus Torque teno virus Yersinia
phage |
MOG |
Avian orthoreovirus Bacillus phage Beet western yellows virus Border disease
virus Citrus tristeza virus Cypovirus
Emiliania huxleyi virus Epstein-Barr Feline infectious peritonitis virus Gallid herpesvirus 2 Heliothis armigera cypovirus Hepatitis
delta Human astrovirus Human coxsackievirus Human immunodeficiency virus
Human papillomavirus Influenza A Louping ill
virus Marseillevirus Merino Walk virus
Mokola virus Mumps virus Murine hepatitis virus Mycobacterium phage Nemesia ring
necrosis Nyamanini virus Phocoena
spinipinnis Seoul virus Streptococcus pyogenes
phage Temperate phage Turnip mosaic
virus Watermelon mosaic virus Yokose virus |
EIF2B5 |
Acanthamoeba polyphaga mimivirus Acidianus two-tailed virus Actinoplanes phage Alfalfa mosaic
virus Ateline herpesvirus 3 Bacillus phage Bacillus thuringiensis phage Bean common
mosaic necrosis virus Burkholderia phage Canarypox virus Canine papillomavirus
Citrus psorosis virus Clanis bilineata nucleopolyhedrosis virus Clostridium phage Corynebacterium phage Cyprinid herpesvirus
3 Ectocarpus siliculosus virus 1 Enterobacteria phage Enterococcus phage Epstein-Barr
Escherichia phage Equid herpesvirus 4
Equid herpesvirus 9 Equine rhinitis B Felid herpesvirus 1 Glossina pallidipes salivary gland
hypertrophy virus Haemophilus phage
Haloarcula phage Helicoverpa armigera NPV
Hepatitis C Human
coronavirus Human enterovirus Human herpesvirus 1 Human herpesvirus 3 Human herpesvirus 5 Human herpesvirus 6 Human herpesvirus 7 Human herpesvirus 8 Human metapneumovirus Human
papillomavirus Hyperthermophilic
Archaeal Virus Klebsiella phage Lactobacillus phage
virus Lactococcus
phage Latino virus Listeria phage
Lymphocystis disease virus Marseillevirus Mumps virus
Mycobacterium
phage Norwalk virus Oryza rufipogon
endornavirus Ostreococcus virus Ostreococcus tauri virus 1 Plutella
xylostella granulovirus Poliovirus
Rachiplusia ou MNPV Ralstonia phage Rubella
SARS coronavirus Shrimp white
spot syndrome virus Soybean chlorotic mottle virus Spinach latent virus St. Louis encephalitis virus
Streptococcus
phage Suid herpesvirus 1 Taterapox
virus Tupaiid herpesvirus Yersinia phage virus Trichoplusia ni SNPV s Staphylococcus phage Shigella phage Variola
West Nile virus |
Fig 2
Human proteins containing Epstein-Barr or Synechococcus phage vatches : Those
in boxes have been reported as multiple sclerosis susceptibility genes.
Grey-shaded proteins have been reported as autoantigens. For the chi squared
test, the expected number of genes is (328/35000)*N: For the autoantigens the
expected number of autoantigens is (37/35000)*N, where 328 is the number of
recorded Msgenes, 37 the recorded number of autoantigens, and 35,000 the number
of human proteins.
(1) Quintana
FJ, Farez MF, Viglietta V, Iglesias AH, Merbl Y, Izquierdo G et al. Antigen
microarrays identify unique serum autoantibody signatures in clinical and
pathologic subtypes of multiple sclerosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008;
105(48):18889-18894.
(2) Wekerle
H, Kojima K, Lannes-Vieira J, Lassmann H, Linington C. Animal models. Ann
Neurol 1994; 36 Suppl:S47-S53.
(3) Ascherio
A, Munger KL. 99th Dahlem conference on infection, inflammation and chronic
inflammatory disorders: Epstein-Barr virus and multiple sclerosis:
epidemiological evidence. Clin Exp Immunol 2010; 160(1):120-124.
(4) Westall
FC. Molecular mimicry revisited: gut bacteria and multiple sclerosis. J Clin
Microbiol 2006; 44(6):2099-2104.
(5) Harkiolaki
M, Holmes SL, Svendsen P, Gregersen JW, Jensen LT, McMahon R et al. T
cell-mediated autoimmune disease due to low-affinity crossreactivity to common
microbial peptides. Immunity 2009; 30(3):348-357.
(6) Birnbaum
G, Kotilinek L. Heat shock or stress proteins and their role as autoantigens in
multiple sclerosis. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1997; 835:157-167.
(7) Katzourakis
A, Gifford RJ. Endogenous Viral Elements in Animal Genomes. Plos Genet 2010;
6(11):e1001191. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1001191.
(8) Geuking
MB, Weber J, Dewannieux M, Gorelik E, Heidmann T, Hengartner H et al.
Recombination of retrotransposon and exogenous RNA virus results in
nonretroviral cDNA integration. Science 2009; 323(5912):393-396.
(9) Liu
H, Fu Y, Jiang D, Li G, Xie J, Cheng J et al. Widespread horizontal gene
transfer from double-stranded RNA viruses to eukaryotic nuclear genomes. J
Virol 2010; 84(22):11876-11887.
(10) Kanduc
D. Describing the hexapeptide identity platform between the influenza A H5N1
and Homo sapiens proteomes. Biologics 2010; 4:245-261.
(11) Ricco
R, Kanduc D. Hepatitis B virus and Homo sapiens proteome-wide analysis: A
profusion of viral peptide overlaps in neuron-specific human proteins.
Biologics 2010; 4:75-81.
(12) Kanduc
D, Stufano A, Lucchese G, Kusalik A. Massive peptide sharing between viral and
human proteomes. Peptides 2008; 29(10):1755-1766.
(13) Carter
CJ. Alzheimer's disease: a pathogenetic autoimmune disorder caused by herpes
simplex in a gene-dependent manner. Int J Alzheimers Dis 2010; 2010:140539.
(14) Trost
B, Lucchese G, Stufano A, Bickis M, Kusalik A, Kanduc D. No human protein is
exempt from bacterial motifs.
Not even one . Self/nonself 1, 1-7. 2011.
Ref Type: Generic
(15) Chatr-aryamontri
A, Ceol A, Peluso D, Nardozza A, Panni S, Sacco F et al. VirusMINT: a viral
protein interaction database. Nucleic Acids Res 2009; 37(Database
issue):D669-D673.
(16) Navratil
V, de Chassey B, Rabourdin-Combe C, Lotteau V. When the human viral infectome
and diseasome networks collide: towards a systems biology platform for the
aetiology of human diseases. BMC Syst Biol 2011; 5(1):13.
(17) Altschul
SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W et al. Gapped BLAST and
PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids
Res 1997; 25(17):3389-3402.
(18) Larsen
JE, Lund O, Nielsen M. Improved method for predicting linear B-cell epitopes.
Immunome Res 2006; 2:2.
(19) Nielsen
M, Lundegaard C, Lund O, Kesmir C. The role of the proteasome in generating
cytotoxic T-cell epitopes: insights obtained from improved predictions of
proteasomal cleavage. Immunogenetics 2005; 57(1-2):33-41.
(20) Lill.C.M.,
McQueen MB, Roehr JT, Bagade S, Schjeide BM, Zipp F et al. The MSGene Database.
Alzheimer Research Forum. Available at http://www.msgene.org/. MsGene 2010.
(21) Hindorff
LA, Sethupathy P, Junkins HA, Ramos EM, Mehta JP, Collins FS et al. A Catalog
of Published Genome-Wide Association Studies. Available at:
www.genome.gov/gwastudies. Accessed [December 2010]. Genome Gov 2010.
(22) Brocchieri
L, Karlin S. Protein length in eukaryotic and prokaryotic proteomes. Nucleic
Acids Res 2005; 33(10):3390-3400.
(23) Van
der Knaap MS, Pronk JC, Scheper GC. Vanishing white matter disease. Lancet
Neurol 2006; 5(5):413-423.
(24) Kurazono
M, Nakamura K, Yamada M, Yonemaru T, Sakoda T. Pathology of listerial
encephalitis in chickens in Japan. Avian Dis 2003; 47(4):1496-1502.
(25) Andersen
O, Lygner PE, Bergstrom T, Andersson M, Vahlne A. Viral infections trigger
multiple sclerosis relapses: a prospective seroepidemiological study. J Neurol
1993; 240(7):417-422.
(26) Vartdal
F, Vandvik B, Norrby E. Viral and bacterial antibody responses in multiple
sclerosis. Ann Neurol 1980; 8(3):248-255.
(27) Brinar
VV, Habek M. Rare infections mimicking MS. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2010;
112(7):625-628.
(28) Dean
G, McDougall EI, Elian M. Multiple sclerosis in research workers studying
swayback in lambs: an updated report. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1985;
48(9):859-865.
(29) Cook
SD, Dowling PC. A possible association between house pets and multiple
sclerosis. Lancet 1977; 1(8019):980-982.
(30) Malosse
D, Perron H. Correlation analysis between bovine populations, other farm
animals, house pets, and multiple sclerosis prevalence. Neuroepidemiology 1993;
12(1):15-27.
(31) Colson
P, Richet H, Desnues C, Balique F, Moal V, Grob JJ et al. Pepper mild mottle
virus, a plant virus associated with specific immune responses, Fever,
abdominal pains, and pruritus in humans. PLoS One 2010; 5(4):e10041.
(32) Cantorna
MT. Vitamin D and multiple sclerosis: an update. Nutr Rev 2008; 66(10 Suppl
2):S135-S138.
(33) Shah
KM, Young LS. Epstein-Barr virus and carcinogenesis: beyond Burkitt's lymphoma.
Clin Microbiol Infect 2009; 15(11):982-988.
(34) Beebe
AM, Cua DJ, de Waal MR. The role of interleukin-10 in autoimmune disease:
systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and multiple sclerosis (MS). Cytokine Growth
Factor Rev 2002; 13(4-5):403-412.
(35) Toussirot
E, Roudier J. Epstein-Barr virus in autoimmune diseases. Best Pract Res Clin
Rheumatol 2008; 22(5):883-896.
(36) Apostolou
F, Gazi IF, Lagos K, Tellis CC, Tselepis AD, Liberopoulos EN et al. Acute
infection with Epstein-Barr virus is associated with atherogenic lipid changes.
Atherosclerosis 2010; 212(2):607-613.
(37) Muntoni
S, Muntoni S. Gene-nutrient interactions in G6PD-deficient subjects--implications
for cardiovascular disease susceptibility. J Nutrigenet Nutrigenomics 2008;
1(1-2):49-54.
(38) Choi
IY, Lee SP, Denney D, Lynch S. Lower levels of glutathione in the brains of
secondary progressive multiple sclerosis patients measured by 1H magnetic
resonance chemical shift imaging at 3 T. Mult Scler 2010.
(39) Back
SA, Gan X, Li Y, Rosenberg PA, Volpe JJ. Maturation-dependent vulnerability of
oligodendrocytes to oxidative stress-induced death caused by glutathione
depletion. J Neurosci 1998; 18(16):6241-6253.
(40) Paintlia
MK, Paintlia AS, Barbosa E, Singh I, Singh AK. N-acetylcysteine prevents
endotoxin-induced degeneration of oligodendrocyte progenitors and
hypomyelination in developing rat brain. J Neurosci Res 2004; 78(3):347-361.
(41) Ram
M, Anaya JM, Barzilai O, Izhaky D, Porat Katz BS, Blank M et al. The putative
protective role of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection from autoimmune disorders.
Autoimmun Rev 2008; 7(8):621-625.
(42) Ozakbas
S, Idiman E, Yulug B, Pakoz B, Bahar H, Gulay Z. Development of multiple
sclerosis after vaccination against hepatitis B: a study based on human
leucocyte antigen haplotypes. Tissue Antigens 2006; 68(3):235-238.
(43) Zivadinov
R, Nasuelli D, Tommasi MA, Serafin M, Bratina A, Ukmar M et al. Positivity of
cytomegalovirus antibodies predicts a better clinical and radiological outcome
in multiple sclerosis patients. Neurol Res 2006; 28(3):262-269.
(44) Sutton
I, Lahoria R, Tan I, Clouston P, Barnett M. CNS demyelination and quadrivalent
HPV vaccination. Mult Scler 2009; 15(1):116-119.
(45) Zwirglmaier
K, Jardillier L, Ostrowski M, Mazard S, Garczarek L, Vaulot D et al. Global
phylogeography of marine Synechococcus and Prochlorococcus reveals a distinct
partitioning of lineages among oceanic biomes. Environ Microbiol 2008;
10(1):147-161.
(46) Falkner
G, Wagner F, Falkner R. On the relation between phosphate uptake and growth of
the cyanobacterium Anacystis nidulans. C R Acad Sci III 1994; 317(6):535-541.
(47) Green
LS, Laudenbach DE, Grossman AR. A region of a cyanobacterial genome required
for sulfate transport. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1989; 86(6):1949-1953.
(48) Romero
JM, Flores E, Guerrero MG. Inhibition of nitrate utilization by amino acids in
intact Anacystis nidulans cells. Arch Microbiol 1985; 142(1):1-5.
(49) Van
Baalen C. The Photooxidation of Uric Acid by Anacystis nidulans. Plant Physiol
1965; 40(2):368-371.
(50) Irvine
DG, Schiefer HB, Hader WJ. Geotoxicology of multiple sclerosis: the Henribourg,
Saskatchewan, Cluster Focus. I. The water. Sci Total Environ 1989; 84:45-59.
(51) Lee
LH, Lui D, Platner PJ, Hsu SF, Chu TC, Gaynor JJ et al. Induction of temperate
cyanophage AS-1 by heavy metal--copper. BMC Microbiol 2006; 6:17.
(52) Ivanov
AI, Fomchenkov VM, Khasanova LA, Kuramshina ZM, Sadikov MM. Influence of heavy
metal ions on the electrophysical properties of Anacystis nidulans and
Escherichia coli cells
Vliianie ionov tiazhelykh metallov na elektrofizicheskie svoistva
bakterial'nykh kletok Anacystis nidulans i Escherichia coli. Mikrobiologiia
1992; 61(3):455-463.
(53) Sherman
DM, Sherman LA. Effect of iron deficiency and iron restoration on
ultrastructure of Anacystis nidulans. J Bacteriol 1983; 156(1):393-401.
(54) Hasanen
E, Kinnunen E, Alhonen P. Relationships between the prevalence of multiple
sclerosis and some physical and chemical properties of soil. Sci Total Environ
1986; 58(3):263-272.
(55) Ingalls
TH. Clustering of multiple sclerosis in Galion, Ohio, 1982-1985. Am J Forensic
Med Pathol 1989; 10(3):213-215.
(56) Amla
DV. Drift in ultraviolet sensitivity and expression of mutations during
synchronous growth of cyanobacterium Anacystis nidulans. Mutat Res 1983;
107(2):229-238.
(57) Amla
DV. Photoreactivation of ultraviolet irradiated blue-green alga: Anacystis
nidulans and cyanophage AS-1. Arch Virol 1979; 59(3):173-179.
(58) Lee
HL, Cohn G, Cosowsky L, McGowan R, Blamire J. DNA metabolism during infection
of Anacystis nidulans by cyanophage AS-1. VII. UV-induced alterations of the
AS-1/A. nidulans lytic cycle. Microbios 1985; 43(176S):277-295.
(59) Beretich
BD, Beretich TM. Explaining multiple sclerosis prevalence by ultraviolet
exposure: a geospatial analysis. Mult Scler 2009; 15(8):891-898.
(60) Lucas
RM, Ponsonby AL, Dear K, Valery PC, Pender MP, Taylor BV et al. Sun exposure
and vitamin D are independent risk factors for CNS demyelination. Neurology
2011; 76(6):540-548.
(61) Ramagopalan
SV, Heger A, Berlanga AJ, Maugeri NJ, Lincoln MR, Burrell A et al. A ChIP-seq
defined genome-wide map of vitamin D receptor binding: associations with
disease and evolution. Genome Res 2010; 20(10):1352-1360.
(62) Courbebaisse
M, Souberbielle JC, Prie D, Thervet E. Non phosphocalcic actions of vitamin D.
Med Sci (Paris) 2010; 26(4):417-421.
(63) Bains
W. Exposure of the eyes to near-horizon sunshine may be a trigger for multiple
sclerosis. Med Hypotheses 2010; 74(3):428-432.
(64) Meier
DS, Balashov KE, Healy B, Weiner HL, Guttmann CR. Seasonal prevalence of MS
disease activity. Neurology 2010; 75(9):799-806.
(65) Salvi
F, Bartolomei I, Smolensky MH, Lorusso A, Barbarossa E, Malagoni AM et al. A
seasonal periodicity in relapses of multiple sclerosis? A single-center,
population-based, preliminary study conducted in Bologna, Italy. BMC Neurol
2010; 10:105.
(66) Klupka-Saric
I, Galic M. Epidemiology of multiple sclerosis in western Herzegovina and
Herzegovina--Neretva Canton, Bosnia and Herzegovina. Coll Antropol 2010; 34
Suppl 1:189-193.
(67) Abad
P, Perez M, Castro E, Alarcon T, Santibanez R, Diaz F. [Prevalence of multiple
sclerosis in Ecuador]
Prevalencia de esclerosis multiple en Ecuador. Neurologia 2010; 25(5):309-313.
(68) Fromont
A, Binquet C, Sauleau EA, Fournel I, Bellisario A, Adnet J et al. Geographic
variations of multiple sclerosis in France. Brain 2010; 133(Pt 7):1889-1899.
(69) Materljan
E, Materljan M, Materljan B, Vlacic H, Baricev-Novakovic Z, Sepcic J. Multiple
sclerosis and cancers in Croatia--a possible protective role of the
"Mediterranean diet". Coll Antropol 2009; 33(2):539-545.
(70) Larsen
JP, Riise T, Nyland H, Kvale G, Aarli JA. Clustering of multiple sclerosis in
the county of Hordaland, Western Norway. Acta Neurol Scand 1985; 71(5):390-395.
(71) Trost
B, Kusalik A, Lucchese G, Kanduc D. Bacterial peptides are intensively present
throughout the human proteome. Self/nonself 1, 71-74. 2010.
Ref Type: Generic
(72) Wang
H, Munger KL, Reindl M, O'Reilly EJ, Levin LI, Berger T et al. Myelin
oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibodies and multiple sclerosis in healthy young
adults. Neurology 2008; 71(15):1142-1146.
(73) Lunemann
JD, Jelcic I, Roberts S, Lutterotti A, Tackenberg B, Martin R et al.
EBNA1-specific T cells from patients with multiple sclerosis cross react with
myelin antigens and co-produce IFN-gamma and IL-2. J Exp Med 2008;
205(8):1763-1773.
(74) Carter
CJ. Interactions between the products of the Herpes simplex genome and
Alzheimer's disease susceptibility genes: relevance to pathological-signalling
cascades. Neurochem Int 2008; 52(6):920-934.
(75) Carter
CJ. Schizophrenia susceptibility genes directly implicated in the life cycles
of pathogens: cytomegalovirus, influenza, herpes simplex, rubella, and
Toxoplasma gondii. Schizophr Bull 2009; 35(6):1163-1182.
(76) Mullen
MM, Haan KM, Longnecker R, Jardetzky TS. Structure of the Epstein-Barr virus
gp42 protein bound to the MHC class II receptor HLA-DR1. Mol Cell 2002;
9(2):375-385.
(77) Yenamandra
SP, Hellman U, Kempkes B, Darekar SD, Petermann S, Sculley T et al.
Epstein-Barr virus encoded EBNA-3 binds to vitamin D receptor and blocks
activation of its target genes. Cell Mol Life Sci 2010; 67(24):4249-4256.
(78) Fremeaux-Bacchi
V, Bernard I, Maillet F, Mani JC, Fontaine M, Bonnefoy JY et al. Human
lymphocytes shed a soluble form of CD21 (the C3dg/Epstein-Barr virus receptor,
CR2) that binds iC3b and CD23. Eur J Immunol 1996; 26(7):1497-1503.
(79) Peters
AL, Stunz LL, Meyerholz DK, Mohan C, Bishop GA. Latent membrane protein 1, the
EBV-encoded oncogenic mimic of CD40, accelerates autoimmunity in B6.Sle1 mice. J
Immunol 2010; 185(7):4053-4062.
(80) Rothenberger
S, Burns K, Rousseaux M, Tschopp J, Bron C. Ubiquitination of the Epstein-Barr
virus-encoded latent membrane protein 1 depends on the integrity of the TRAF
binding site. Oncogene 2003; 22(36):5614-5618.
(81) Wang
Z, Luo F, Li L, Yang L, Hu D, Ma X et al. STAT3 activation induced by
Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein1 causes vascular endothelial growth
factor expression and cellular invasiveness via JAK3 And ERK signaling. Eur J
Cancer 2010; 46(16):2996-3006.
(82) Geiger
TR, Martin JM. The Epstein-Barr virus-encoded LMP-1 oncoprotein negatively
affects Tyk2 phosphorylation and interferon signaling in human B cells. J Virol
2006; 80(23):11638-11650.
(83) Ning
S, Huye LE, Pagano JS. Interferon regulatory factor 5 represses expression of
the Epstein-Barr virus oncoprotein LMP1: braking of the IRF7/LMP1 regulatory
circuit. J Virol 2005; 79(18):11671-11676.
(84) Kvansakul
M, Wei AH, Fletcher JI, Willis SN, Chen L, Roberts AW et al. Structural basis
for apoptosis inhibition by Epstein-Barr virus BHRF1. PLoS Pathog 2010;
6(12):e1001236.
(85) Bristol
JA, Robinson AR, Barlow EA, Kenney SC. The Epstein-Barr virus BZLF1 protein
inhibits tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 expression through effects on cellular
C/EBP proteins. J Virol 2010; 84(23):12362-12374.
(86) Fukuda
M, Kurosaki H, Sairenji T. Loss of functional transforming growth factor
(TGF)-beta type II receptor results in insensitivity to TGF-beta1-mediated
apoptosis and Epstein-Barr virus reactivation. J Med Virol 2006;
78(11):1456-1464.
(87) Peel
AL. PKR activation in neurodegenerative disease. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 2004;
63(2):97-105.
(88) Wozniak
MA, Shipley SJ, Dobson CB, Parker SP, Scott FT, Leedham-Green M et al. Does
apolipoprotein E determine outcome of infection by varicella zoster virus and
by Epstein Barr virus? Eur J Hum Genet 2007; 15(6):672-678.
(89) Hughes
LE, Smith PA, Bonell S, Natt RS, Wilson C, Rashid T et al. Cross-reactivity
between related sequences found in Acinetobacter sp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa,
myelin basic protein and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein in multiple
sclerosis. J Neuroimmunol 2003; 144(1-2):105-115.
(90) Carter
CJ. Alzheimer's disease plaques and tangles: Cemeteries of a Pyrrhic victory of
the immune defence network against herpes simplex infection at the expense of
complement and inflammation-mediated neuronal destruction. Neurochem Int 2010.
(91) Rivers
TM, Sprunt DH, Berry GP. OBSERVATIONS ON ATTEMPTS TO PRODUCE ACUTE DISSEMINATED
ENCEPHALOMYELITIS IN MONKEYS. J Exp Med 1933; 58(1):39-53.
(92) Wang
JH, Pappas D, De Jager PL, Pelletier D, de Bakker PI, Kappos L et al. Modeling
the Cumulative Genetic Risk for Multiple Sclerosis from Genome Wide Association
Data. Genome Med 2011; 3(1):3.
(93) Lettre
G, Rioux JD. Autoimmune diseases: insights from genome-wide association
studies. Hum Mol Genet 2008; 17(R2):R116-R121.
(94) Jonsson
R, Nakken B, Halse AK, Skarstein K, Brokstad K, Haga HJ. Heredity and
immunology in Sjogren's syndrome
Arvelighet og immunologi ved Sjogrens syndrom. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 2000;
120(7):811-814.
(95) Phillips
D, Prentice L, Upadhyaya M, Lunt P, Chamberlain S, Roberts DF et al. Autosomal
dominant inheritance of autoantibodies to thyroid peroxidase and thyroglobulin--studies
in families not selected for autoimmune thyroid disease. J Clin Endocrinol
Metab 1991; 72(5):973-975.
(96) Janeway
CA, Travers P, Walport M, Schlonchik MJ. The Immune System in Health and
Disease. New York: Garland Science, 2011.
(97) Bartsch
S, Montag D, Schachner M, Bartsch U. Increased number of unmyelinated axons in
optic nerves of adult mice deficient in the myelin-associated glycoprotein
(MAG). Brain Res 1997; 762(1-2):231-234.
(98) Martini
R, Mohajeri MH, Kasper S, Giese KP, Schachner M. Mice doubly deficient in the
genes for P0 and myelin basic protein show that both proteins contribute to the
formation of the major dense line in peripheral nerve myelin. J Neurosci 1995;
15(6):4488-4495.
(99) Aboul-Enein
F, Rauschka H, Kornek B, Stadelmann C, Stefferl A, Bruck W et al. Preferential
loss of myelin-associated glycoprotein reflects hypoxia-like white matter
damage in stroke and inflammatory brain diseases. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol
2003; 62(1):25-33.
(100) Pardridge
WM. Re-engineering biopharmaceuticals for delivery to brain with molecular
Trojan horses. Bioconjug Chem 2008; 19(7):1327-1338.
(101) Mallery
DL, McEwan WA, Bidgood SR, Towers GJ, Johnson CM, James LC. Antibodies mediate
intracellular immunity through tripartite motif-containing 21 (TRIM21). Proc
Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010; 107(46):19985-19990.
(102) Ulzheimer
JC, Meuth SG, Bittner S, Kleinschnitz C, Kieseier BC, Wiendl H. Therapeutic
approaches to multiple sclerosis: an update on failed, interrupted, or
inconclusive trials of immunomodulatory treatment strategies. BioDrugs 2010;
24(4):249-274.
(103) Hosokawa
S, Oyamaguchi A, Yoshida O. Successful immunoadsorption with membrane
plasmapheresis for multiple sclerosis. ASAIO Trans 1989; 35(3):576-577.
(104) Cortese
I, Chaudhry V, So YT, Cantor F, Cornblath DR, Rae-Grant A. Evidence-based
guideline update: Plasmapheresis in neurologic disorders: Report of the
Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of
Neurology. Neurology 2011; 76(3):294-300.
(105) Moldenhauer
A, Haas J, Wascher C, Derfuss T, Hoffmann KT, Kiesewetter H et al.
Immunoadsorption patients with multiple sclerosis: an open-label pilot study.
Eur J Clin Invest 2005; 35(8):523-530.
(106) Nomura
K. [Therapeutic apheresis in multiple sclerosis]. Nippon Rinsho 2003;
61(8):1388-1395.
(107) de
Andres C, Anaya F, Gimenez-Roldan S. [Plasma immunoadsorption treatment of
malignant multiple sclerosis with severe and prolonged relapses]. Rev Neurol
2000; 30(7):601-605.
(108) Palm
M, Behm E, Schmitt E, Buddenhagen F, Hitzschke B, Kracht M et al.
Immunoadsorption and plasma exchange in multiple sclerosis: complement and
plasma protein behaviour. Biomater Artif Cells Immobilization Biotechnol 1991;
19(1):283-296.
(109) Schneidewind
JM, Winkler R, Ramlow W, Tiess M, Hertel U, Sehland D. Immunoadsorption--a new
therapeutic possibility for multiple sclerosis? Transfus Sci 1998; 19
Suppl:59-63.
(110) Schweigreiter
R. The natural history of the myelin-derived nerve growth inhibitor Nogo-A.
Neuron Glia Biol 2008; 4(2):83-89.
View Stats